Skip to content

Conversation

@ray-roestenburg-da
Copy link
Contributor

@ray-roestenburg-da ray-roestenburg-da commented Jul 18, 2025

Fixes https://github.com/DACH-NY/cn-test-failures/issues/1054

More info also in https://github.com/DACH-NY/cn-test-failures/issues/5027 where it shows that istio temporarily returns 503

Pull Request Checklist

Cluster Testing

  • If a cluster test is required, comment /cluster_test on this PR to request it, and ping someone with access to the DA-internal system to approve it.
  • If a hard-migration test is required (from the latest release), comment /hdm_test on this PR to request it, and ping someone with access to the DA-internal system to approve it.

PR Guidelines

  • Include any change that might be observable by our partners or affect their deployment in the release notes.
  • Specify fixed issues with Fixes #n, and mention issues worked on using #n
  • Include a screenshot for frontend-related PRs - see README or use your favorite screenshot tool

Merge Guidelines

  • Make the git commit message look sensible when squash-merging on GitHub (most likely: just copy your PR description).

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds retry logic to a test that was experiencing flaky failures by wrapping the dumpParticipantIdentities() call in an eventually() block. This addresses intermittent CI test failures documented in issue #1054.

  • Adds retry mechanism to the "dump participant identities" test case to handle transient failures
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

apps/app/src/test/scala/org/lfdecentralizedtrust/splice/integration/tests/runbook/ValidatorPreflightIntegrationTest.scala:402

  • The eventually() block should include timeout and interval parameters to make the retry behavior predictable and avoid indefinite waiting. Consider adding explicit timeout configuration like eventually(timeout(30.seconds), interval(1.second)).
    eventually() {

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you probs want eventuallySucceeds

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah thanks

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed.

Signed-off-by: Raymond Roestenburg <[email protected]>
@ray-roestenburg-da ray-roestenburg-da force-pushed the ray/retry_dump/cntf/1054 branch from 9bdbead to f99c67f Compare July 18, 2025 11:27
@ray-roestenburg-da ray-roestenburg-da enabled auto-merge (squash) July 18, 2025 11:28
@ray-roestenburg-da ray-roestenburg-da merged commit ca276f0 into main Jul 18, 2025
56 checks passed
@ray-roestenburg-da ray-roestenburg-da deleted the ray/retry_dump/cntf/1054 branch July 18, 2025 12:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants